Now, herpetology was never my strong suit. I admit to knowing next to nothing about snakes, except that they’re at their most attractive and interesting when they are nowhere near me. The scientific accuracy of the claim is apocryphal, yet parenthetical: “Hey, we’re tryin’ to sell some tickets here.”īut even the most neophyte horror film voyeur realizes that when a pre-credits statement warns that Anacondas are unique among snakes, so vindictive that they regurgitate their victims in order to swallow them again, well, it’s there for a reason. The plot, like that of most monster flicks, is merely a device to set up some ideally novel, but ultimately way too torpid, deaths. Sure Darwinism claims some innocent victims (like the regrettably clothed Kari Wuhrer), but filmdom has taught us that avarice and other nastiness is just asking for trouble.Įnter Jon Voigt.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |